Comments on: Implicit construction of objects http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/ .net development tips Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: nadav http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-8 nadav Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:48:49 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-8 This is very nice, but it is only useful when the object we construction is based on one object. I like what you said about less being more and i agree. i think this does look nicer and a little clearer to "the non-programmer". And usually when codding we try to make it understandable by him, if he gets it, everyone gets it. nice post =] This is very nice, but it is only useful when the object we construction is based on one object.

I like what you said about less being more and i agree. i think this does look nicer and a little clearer to “the non-programmer”.
And usually when codding we try to make it understandable by him, if he gets it, everyone gets it.

nice post =]

]]> By: reshef http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-7 reshef Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:44:41 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-7 I didn't test performance but there should be no problem since all it does is to call a static method. I didn’t test performance but there should be no problem since all it does is to call a static method.

]]> By: Noy http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-6 Noy Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:21:57 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-6 great post! what about performance wise? is it act differently? great post!

what about performance wise?
is it act differently?

]]>