Comments for Reshef's tip of the day http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef .net development tips Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:26:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Comment on Implicit construction of objects by nadav http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-8 nadav Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:48:49 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-8 This is very nice, but it is only useful when the object we construction is based on one object. I like what you said about less being more and i agree. i think this does look nicer and a little clearer to "the non-programmer". And usually when codding we try to make it understandable by him, if he gets it, everyone gets it. nice post =] This is very nice, but it is only useful when the object we construction is based on one object.

I like what you said about less being more and i agree. i think this does look nicer and a little clearer to “the non-programmer”.
And usually when codding we try to make it understandable by him, if he gets it, everyone gets it.

nice post =]

]]> Comment on Implicit construction of objects by reshef http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-7 reshef Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:44:41 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-7 I didn't test performance but there should be no problem since all it does is to call a static method. I didn’t test performance but there should be no problem since all it does is to call a static method.

]]> Comment on Implicit construction of objects by Noy http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-6 Noy Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:21:57 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2008/01/03/implicit-construction-of-objects/#comment-6 great post! what about performance wise? is it act differently? great post!

what about performance wise?
is it act differently?

]]> Comment on Reflection and performance: DynamicMethod by Reshef’s tip of the day » Blog Archive » DynamicMethod full example http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2007/12/17/reflection-and-performance-dynamicmethod/#comment-4 Reshef’s tip of the day » Blog Archive » DynamicMethod full example Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:14:56 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/?p=26#comment-4 [...] Reshef’s tip of the day .net development tips « Reflection and performance: DynamicMethod [...] [...] Reshef’s tip of the day .net development tips « Reflection and performance: DynamicMethod [...]

]]> Comment on Tip of the day: DictionaryAdapter by reshef http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2007/11/25/tip-of-the-day-dictionaryadapter/#comment-3 reshef Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:11:30 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/?p=12#comment-3 Hi Tzahi, 1) Performance: The first time that a type of dictionary adapter (the interface) is requested, the code is being emitted in runtime which takes time though it should be quite fast and then it caches it. Any following call to the factory will return the already created type without performance cost. So to conclude, the performance cost is only at startup. 2) Datatypes: The adapter returns the types as they are - if the dictionary holds a DateTime type, the adapter then should return a DateTime. The adapter doesn't handle explicit conversion between data types. In this example, the configuration is stored in an xml file so naturally it will be strings and ints. 3) Aliasing will just let u call the type of the dictionary differently but wouldn't make it typed and therefore there will be no performance gain. Hi Tzahi,

1) Performance: The first time that a type of dictionary adapter (the interface) is requested, the code is being emitted in runtime which takes time though it should be quite fast and then it caches it. Any following call to the factory will return the already created type without performance cost. So to conclude, the performance cost is only at startup.

2) Datatypes: The adapter returns the types as they are - if the dictionary holds a DateTime type, the adapter then should return a DateTime. The adapter doesn’t handle explicit conversion between data types.
In this example, the configuration is stored in an xml file so naturally it will be strings and ints.

3) Aliasing will just let u call the type of the dictionary differently but wouldn’t make it typed and therefore there will be no performance gain.

]]> Comment on Tip of the day: DictionaryAdapter by Tzahi http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/2007/11/25/tip-of-the-day-dictionaryadapter/#comment-2 Tzahi Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:34:48 +0000 http://jajahdevblog.com/reshef/?p=12#comment-2 Hi Reshef, My name is Tzahi and I'm very interested in your tips. I have two questions and one comment: 1) what is the performance cost? 2) it seems to me that the adapter can implement simple Interfaces. Specifically, only primitive types of the same type. For example, only strings or only ints, but no combined strings and ints and no objects. 3) as an advocate reader of your tips, wouldn't aliasing the dictionary also achieve points 1 and 3? Tzahi Hi Reshef,

My name is Tzahi and I’m very interested in your tips.
I have two questions and one comment:

1) what is the performance cost?
2) it seems to me that the adapter can implement simple Interfaces. Specifically, only primitive types of the same type. For example, only strings or only ints, but no combined strings and ints and no objects.
3) as an advocate reader of your tips, wouldn’t aliasing the dictionary also achieve points 1 and 3?

Tzahi

]]>